Do we finally have a grown-up government?

Politics, unlike commentary, is the art of the possible. It is about getting things done and surviving in the process. One means of survival, however, is to try to do as little as possible, and we have had a very graphic example of that recently. The Labour government led by Gordon Brown can be rightly condemned for an almost pathological inwardness that meant that the continued maintenance of the leader was all that mattered. Policies were always made for the short-term and actions were always determined by tactics and never strategy.

In comparison the coalition led by David Cameron is a revelation. It gives every impression of being a government that is actually trying to get things done. Clearly, not everything, or perhaps even anything, the government is doing is perfect and beyond criticism. Yet it does appear to have some clear idea of how it wishes to govern. I wish to point to three breaks from the recent past.

First, there appears to be a genuine attempt to decentralise. The Prime Minister does not wish to be involved in all decisions and departments are allowed to think for themselves rather than being dictated to by the Treasury. The result is the first signs of clear thinking on issues like education and welfare reform. The policies that are being developed may have their faults and they may not go far enough. But as we saw with the Thatcher governments, reform has to be done incrementally. So we need these first steps before we can start running.

Second, the government is not trying to be monolithic and present a corporate view. In other words, as we saw with Vince Cable’s pronouncements at the Liberal Democrat conference last month, dissent is to be allowed and debate encouraged. Clearly there are limits to this, but we do seem to have a government that is genuinely diverse and so more likely to be representative of the country as a whole.

Third, the government is already showing signs that it is not being burdened by short-term decisions but is actually going for the radical option. The key example again here is welfare reform, where there seems to be a genuine attempt to overhaul a corrupt and corrupting system. Moreover, the coalition seems to have clear principles that underpin these reforms and have some idea of how they might be implemented.

Of course, these reforms might stall and the government might not achieve all that it sets out to do. But what we have seen over the last six months is government by grown ups – which is really quite interesting now that the kids have just taken over the Labour Party.

I must say that the degree of open discussion in the coalition is welcome (and surprising given how the Conservative party tried to completely kill off open discussion after the problems of the Major years). The media will always try to create splits even if they are non existent so one may as well have the benefits of genuine ones! I would have slightly more confidence in Peter’s hypothesis if there were genuine fiscal decentralisation and local government reform – this is a huge missed opportunity. We should also not forget that, whatever the merits of the issues, the creation of tax credits, the FSA and Bank of England independence were early examples of Labour strategic thinking.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.