NHS reforms will not solve the fundamental problems of state-run healthcare

Andrew Lansley’s Health and Social Care Bill promises the biggest top down reorganisation of the NHS since its inception. This is a consummation of the reforms that have been implemented since the 1990 NHS and Community Care Act, based on the concept of ‘marketisation’. But in fact these reforms risk increasing the power of central bureaucracy in order to drive down costs. The new ‘independent’ NHS Board – a crucial part of the plans - will be a centralised bureaucracy that allocates budgets but remains largely unaccountable to the people it will affect.

The last 63 years have seen the failure of central planning in the NHS, yet our politicians clearly remain wedded to this ineffective institution. As Hayek wrote ‘Is it really likely that a National Planning Officer would have a better judgement of the number of cars…we are likely to require in, say, five years, than Ford or General Motors?’ One could easily apply this logic to the NHS. Hayek also wrote ‘the more the state plans the more difficult planning becomes for the individual’. Central planning restricts freedom, decreases productivity and drives up costs. Despite 13 years of ‘New Labour investment’, the UK slid down to 14th in the EU annual healthcare index in 2009. In 2008 the ONS reported a 10% fall in productivity.

The coalition’s reforms are based on the premise that it is futile to diverge radically from the current model of nationalised healthcare. The state can therefore only hope to create a more efficient centralised structure and the bureaucracy will continue to misallocate resources and incur high costs (exacerbated by an ageing population). Indeed, there are a number of specific reasons to doubt that the reforms will deliver significant efficiency gains. For example, a likely result of the policy to abolish PCTs will be that many of the bureaucrats made redundant will be employed by the new GP consortia. Reforming the structure of the NHS will not solve the system’s fundamental problems.

"The last 63 years have seen the failure of central planning in the NHS, yet our politicians clearly remain wedded to this ineffective institution." I think that's probably because it's loved by the British people - you know, the people whose lives have improved immeasurably as a result of the NHS - and in all likelihood the institution most dear to their hearts. You may consider that a minor thing, or think us misguided, but it is why politicians are at the least reluctant to publically state their preference for the break-up of the NHS.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Invest in the IEA. We are the catalyst for changing consensus and influencing public debate.

Donate now

Thank you for
your support

Subscribe to
publications

Subscribe

eNEWSLETTER