Nineteen years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, socialism is thriving in East Germany

This Sunday will be the 19th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall – one of the greatest victories for freedom in contemporary history, and a powerful reminder that huge advances in liberty can be made under the most adverse conditions.

But the fall of the wall also reminds us that liberty must never be taken for granted. Recent surveys have shown that socialist values are becoming more popular in East Germany, a development that would have been unimaginable in the euphoria of the reunification period.

Nearly three quarters of East Germans believe that socialism is a “good idea” which has just been “poorly implemented to date”. Only a third feels confident about the market economy, while 81% believe that the federal government ought to do more for ‘social justice’ and the same proportion believe that key industries should be run by the government.

Part of this dramatic shift can certainly be attributed to the mistakes that have been made during the economic transformation.

Firstly, in the privatisation process, there was no equivalent to Margaret Thatcher’s policy to encourage private ownership in the UK. Modified adaptations of the right-to-buy legislation and the sale of shares to the employees of newly privatised enterprises would have given East Germans a stake in the newly emerging market economy.

Secondly, the Bonn government abused the currency as a tool for wealth transfer. The East German Mark was exchanged for West German Marks at a rate of 1:1, while black market rates were between 4:1 and 5:1. As a result, wages rose faster than productivity, causing a wave of bankruptcies and widespread unemployment. 

Thirdly, the intricate labour law, red tape, social insurance and tax system of West Germany were simply imposed on the East. As a result the expected take-off of the East German economy never happened. The gap was filled by transfer payments from the West, which continue to this day.

But most importantly, the advocates of a free economy totally underestimated the power of ideas. They thought that the failure of socialism was just too blatantly obvious and that capitalism would be appreciated simply because it “works”. So they withdrew from the intellectual battle.

This was a fatal mistake. Liberty must be constantly defended in its own right. People will not embrace liberal values simply because a Volkswagen is a nicer car than a Trabant.

It’s not only in Germany. Thriving to personal economic success in new – market circumstances is compared to what was before… Efforts one does to prosper in transition economies usually fundamentally shakes people. They are not secured as before, work much more goal concentrated, feeling their lifes at risk, all the time. The idea is to combine both planning elements in welfare and capitalistic society allowing competition leading to better in everything (as F.D.Roosevelt did in 1930s).

Hi R.T.,The idea is to combine both planning elements in welfare and capitalistic society.That’s precisely what East Germany already has: a combination of a market and a state-run economy. People don’t seem to like it, according to the surveys I quote from.

Planning elements is social welfare which was absent before Roosevelt. Capital has ruined the markets before 1930s. Forced by communism in Russia and same kind of a danger in Europe, ffter appropriate corrections free industrial world has flourished. It is the same momentum now: world needs changes to be developed and adopted, forced by peoples poverty knocking the door.

It’s not only in Germany. Thriving to personal economic success in new – market circumstances is compared to what was before… Efforts one does to prosper in transition economies usually fundamentally shakes people. They are not secured as before, work much more goal concentrated, feeling their lifes at risk, all the time. The idea is to combine both planning elements in welfare and capitalistic society allowing competition leading to better in everything (as F.D.Roosevelt did in 1930s).

Hi R.T.,The idea is to combine both planning elements in welfare and capitalistic society.That’s precisely what East Germany already has: a combination of a market and a state-run economy. People don’t seem to like it, according to the surveys I quote from.

Planning elements is social welfare which was absent before Roosevelt. Capital has ruined the markets before 1930s. Forced by communism in Russia and same kind of a danger in Europe, ffter appropriate corrections free industrial world has flourished. It is the same momentum now: world needs changes to be developed and adopted, forced by peoples poverty knocking the door.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Invest in the IEA. We are the catalyst for changing consensus and influencing public debate.

Donate now

Thank you for
your support

Subscribe to
publications

Subscribe