Pope Pius IX and the errors of socialism

Pope Pius IX had everything modern in his sights when he wrote the Syllabus of Errors and related encyclicals. It was not just socialism that came in for a pasting and I am sure he would have been no friend of a liberal market economy. Non-Catholic Christians would also be offended by some of what he wrote, but that is not a subject for the IEA blog. However, I was particularly struck by two phrases on socialism:  

“To this goal also tends the unspeakable doctrine of Communism, as it is called, a doctrine most opposed to the very natural law. For if this doctrine were accepted, the complete destruction of everyone’s laws, government, property, and even of human society itself would follow.”

Quite a good prediction for 1846 of what was to happen in much of the world. And:  

“As regards this teaching and these theories, it is now generally known that the special goal of their proponents is to introduce to the people the pernicious fictions of Socialism and Communism by misapplying the terms ‘liberty’ and ‘equality’. The final goal shared by these teachings, whether of Communism or Socialism, even if approached differently, is to excite by continuous disturbances workers and others, especially those of the lower class, whom they have deceived by their lies and deluded by the promise of a happier condition. They are preparing them for plundering, stealing, and usurping first the Church’s and then everyone’s property.”

Again, not bad for 1849 (in this case). I was particularly interested in the phrase “misapplying the terms ‘liberty’ and ‘equality’”.

Your right that is interesting. Amazing perception, I wonder what he would say now.

Remark of B. Sheridan is just to the point. If current crisis makes substantial part of population poor ideas of communism will again appear on the scene. I talked to well educated person stuck in poverty: he believes that Lenin and Stalin were good! What I believe is that any moves towards left or right – combined together through tough times – will lead to developing receipes to better welfare of the world. What we see now is some signal requring respective action by powers.

To get to the point of the Pope’s critique of socialism, this is a world-view which places before Man the chief end of devoting his whole life to the creation, for common ownership, as much material wealth as possible, as efficiently as possible.Mere public ownership of parts of the economy are not by themselves enough to disclose the existence of socialism, but only this total claim including the principled negation of private property.

Your right that is interesting. Amazing perception, I wonder what he would say now.

Remark of B. Sheridan is just to the point. If current crisis makes substantial part of population poor ideas of communism will again appear on the scene. I talked to well educated person stuck in poverty: he believes that Lenin and Stalin were good! What I believe is that any moves towards left or right – combined together through tough times – will lead to developing receipes to better welfare of the world. What we see now is some signal requring respective action by powers.

To get to the point of the Pope’s critique of socialism, this is a world-view which places before Man the chief end of devoting his whole life to the creation, for common ownership, as much material wealth as possible, as efficiently as possible.Mere public ownership of parts of the economy are not by themselves enough to disclose the existence of socialism, but only this total claim including the principled negation of private property.

The people couldn't find the ideal economic system. It always will have some problems.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

IEA Brexit prize

Invest in the IEA. We are the catalyst for changing consensus and influencing public debate.

Donate now

Thank you for
your support

Subscribe to
publications

Subscribe

eNEWSLETTER