The Church should not be afraid of a true Educational Market Place
Archbishop Vincent Nichols' lecture on education last week is certainly to be welcomed. It points to a number of disturbing features of education in Britain which we would like to see reversed.
However, it is wrong for the Archbishop to argue, as he did, that these are the trends of an educational marketplace. Specifically, he said: once this [approach to education] really takes hold, then education has truly entered the marketplace and its entire ecological system is threatened with pollution In effect what is happening is that the patterns of the market are flooding over all aspects of life and we are finding ourselves considered as nothing more than consumers and suppliers.
Yet there is no real concept of a market in the British education system. There was something a little closer to a market (especially in Scotland) until 1976 when direct grant schools were abolished and those schools I suspect, were much less utilitarian than todays state controlled schools operating completely outside the market economy.
There is currently much discussion about how schools should be funded and an imprecise use of terms in other contexts could potentially cloud that debate. One aspect of that debate is whether schools could be much freer from state control yet still be state funded and possibly be profit-making (as in Sweden).
Catholic schools could sit very happily in such a marketplace for education in the same was as fair trade products (of which I am sceptical, but that is another matter) sit in the marketplace and friendly societies in the 19th century sat in the marketplace for welfare insurance. The market does not have to be driven by materialistic or narrowly instrumentalist considerations.
The trends in education that the Archbishop rightly criticises are instrumentalist, utilitari