Taxpayers likely to shore up cost of new rail investment

Claims that rail investment can be funded through higher
 fare revenues and efficiency gains should be treated with scepticism.

Commenting on today's government announcement of a new £9 billion rail investment, Dr. Richard Wellings, Head of Transport at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:





“The government's main priority should be phasing out taxpayer subsidies 
to the railways rather than investing in additional loss-making 
projects. Indeed, claims that the schemes can be funded through higher
 fare revenues and efficiency gains should be treated with scepticism. In
 reality taxpayers are likely to end up paying a significant share of the 
costs. This is particularly objectionable given that rail travellers are
 on average wealthier than the general population.


 


“In addition, it would seem that many of the projects are motivated by 
politics rather than economics, representing attempts to gain political 
favour in particular regions. If economic objectives were the priority,
 the government would be investing the money in road schemes, which
 generally produce far greater economic returns.”
    

Notes to editors:

To arrange an interview with an IEA spokesperson, please contact Ruth Porter, Communications Director: 0207 799 8920 or 07751 71778.

The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.

The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.

Invest in the IEA. We are the catalyst for changing consensus and influencing public debate.

Donate now

Thank you for
your support

Subscribe to
publications