30 July 2010
IEA report condemns World Bank "pension privatisation" model
download document | download summary
A report published today by the Institute of Economic Affairs* condemns the pension privatisation model that has been promoted by the World Bank and which has provided a blueprint for reform in South America and Central and Eastern Europe.
The report argues that compulsory private pension schemes have often been implemented in countries where the basic financial infrastructure is poorly developed. As such, they provide families with little security and undermine other methods of saving and other provision for old age that families find valuable. Compulsory private pension funds are often so highly regulated that "privatisation" occurs in name only.
State social security in under-developed and middle-income countries, the report argues, produces even worse outcomes with pensions often being undermined by inflation, corruption or as a result of the government taking social security funds and using them for general spending. State social security systems also lead to reduced fertility (by reducing the need for extended family support) and earlier retirement, thus undermining the finances of a pay-as-you-go system.
The authors propose that the government should not be at the centre of social security or pension provision - either by providing its own system or through mandating private provision. Instead, the government should focus on ensuring that the rule of law prevails, that corruption is minimised and, most crucially, that legal systems are in place so that long-term, secure savings institutions can be developed that can invest in the private sector.
Commenting on the report, IEA Editorial and Programme Director, Philip Booth, said, "The recent experience of Argentina illustrates the problems graphically. So-called pension privatisation involved mandatory saving in highly regulated schemes. The government then came along and expropriated the funds. What we need the state to provide is a strong legal framework and then the financial infrastructure will be developed. At that point individuals and families will make their own provision because they know that their long-term savings will be secure."
The report shows how individuals and families make old-age income provision in a variety of ways – through voluntary private saving, continuing informal working, as well as through parenthood and kinship networks - and argues that the state’s job should be to support and not undermine the institutions that make this possible.
*Pension Provision: Government Failure Around the World, edited by Philip Booth, Oskari Juurikkala and Nick Silver, Readings 63, Institute of Economic Affairs, £15.00.
Notes to editors
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties. It accepts no corporate funds linked to research areas and allows no corporate donor to exceed more than 2% of annual income.
Contacts
Philip Booth (IEA) Tel: +44 (0)20 7799 8912
Richard Wellings (IEA) Tel: +44 (0)20 7799 8919
Institute of Economic Affairs, 2 Lord North Street, Westminster, London, SW1P 3LB | tel: 020 7799 8900 | fax: 020 7799 2137 | email: iea@iea.org.uk
Registered In England 755502, Charity No CC/235 351, Limited by Guarantee
site by politicos design: campaigning online with political & mp websites
